LL change: the status of STATUS_DIE_AT_* is returned

As of Second Life Server 2022-09-09.574921, STATUS_DIE_AT_EDGE and STATUS_DIE_AT_NO_ENTRY return their corresponding settings rather than always FALSE.

Regression/coverage tests are clearly lacking in this area, as the change didn't trigger any test breakage, therefore add some unit tests.

lslopt/lslextrafuncs.py

@@ -332,11 +332,8 @@ def llGetOwnerKey(id):
     raise ELSLCantCompute
 
 def llGetStatus(mask):
-    # Leave out STATUS_DIE_AT_EDGE, _DIE_AT_NO_ENTRY and _CAST_SHADOWS.
+    # Leave out STATUS_CAST_SHADOWS from the flags to check.
-    # For some reason, llGetStatus(STATUS_DIE_AT_EDGE) does not return the
+    if (mask & ~0x200) == 0:
-    # actual value of whether the flag is set or not for the object. Same for
-    # STATUS_DIE_AT_NO_ENTRY. STATUS_CAST_SHADOWS is unused so that's normal.
-    if (mask & ~(0x800|0x200|0x80)) == 0:
         return 0
     raise ELSLCantCompute
 

unit_tests/regression.suite/computable.lsl

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ default
             , llGetDisplayName("")
             , llGetEnv("")
             , llGetEnv("yadda")
+            , llGetStatus(STATUS_CAST_SHADOWS)
             ]);
     }
 }

unit_tests/regression.suite/computable.out

@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ default
             , ""
             , ""
             , ""
+            , 0
             ]);
     }
 }

unit_tests/regression.suite/non-computable.lsl

@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ default
             , llGetEnv("estate_name")
             , llXorBase64Strings("++++", "?")
             , llAbs(-2147483648)
+            , llGetStatus(STATUS_DIE_AT_EDGE)
+            , llGetStatus(STATUS_DIE_AT_NO_ENTRY)
             ]);
     }
 }

unit_tests/regression.suite/non-computable.out

@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ default
             , llGetEnv("estate_name")
             , llXorBase64Strings("++++", "?")
             , llAbs(((integer)-2147483648))
+            , llGetStatus(128)
+            , llGetStatus(2048)
             ]);
     }
 }